Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Visiting Lecturer, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

2 Associate professor of International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz,Iran

10.22034/irlsmp.2021.122127

Abstract

The sea pathways are extensively considers as a way to reach a safe zone for the forced people, who their lives are threatened for many reasons. A large number of the irregular migrants, asylum seekers and refugees are drowned daily in the sea, particularly in the Mediterranean Sea. The numbers of the deaths are worrying and alarming. It requires urgent and effective actions by States to prevent this disastrous human crisis. This paper through descriptive and analytical research method through a qualitative research examines the international legal framework for the protection of irregular migrants, asylum seekers and refugees’ rights and focuses on two essential rights of their rescue at sea and its related right of non-refoulement. The paper concludes that the security and military ironic measures of the coastal States, particularly those of certain European States, are considered as a serious risk for the rights of the people trafficked through the sea in order to be moved from the place of danger to a safe zone. Accordingly, States must play a more responsible role in assisting and protecting the desperate irregular, asylum seekers and refugees at sea in order to guarantee their fundamental rights.

Keywords

Main Subjects

-Bak, Tomasz (2016). The Wave of Migration in Europe as a Cause of Terrorist Threat. In International Conference Knowledge-Based Organization, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 1-9.
-European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (2011), Regulation No 1168/2011, accessed via: https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/e-library/glossary/european-agency-management_en, accessed date: 12/29/2020
-General legal considerations: Search-and-rescue operations involving refugees and migrants, UNCHR-The UN Refugee Agency, UNCHR-The UN Refugee Agency, https://www.refworld.org/docid/5a2e9efd4.html, pp.1-7.
-Ghezelbash, Daniel (2018). Violeta Moreno-Lax, Natalie Klein, and Brian Opeskin. Securitization of search and rescue at sea: the response to boat migration in the Mediterranean and offshore Australia. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 315-351.
-Guterres, Antonio (2011). A Personal Appeal from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees." UNHCR, pp. 1-12.
-Hathaway, J. C. (2005). The rights of refugees under international law. Cambridge University Press.
-ICMPD, (2019) Bridging refugee protection and development, accessed via: https://www.icmpd.org/news-centre/news-detail/expert-voice-bridging-refugee-protection-and-development/, accessed date: 12/29/2020
-International Organization for Migration, Glossary on Migration, International Migration Law (2011). 2nd Edition, Geneva, Switzerland.
-International Organization for Migration (2019). Glossary on Migration, Geneva, Switzerland.
-Kadkhodaie, Abbas Ali and Soraya Rostami (2019) Legal Challenges of Solitary and Joint Commitments of the European Union Member States toward the Refugees and Immigrants, In Farsi: “Chaleshhaye Hoqoqi Taahodat Enferadi va Moshtarak Doval Ozve Etehadieh Oropaei Dar Ghebale Panahandegan va Mohajeran”, Public Law Studies Quarterly, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp. 23-38.
-New Humanitarian, accessed via: https://deeply.thenewhumanitarian.org/refugees /background/international-legal-framework, accessed date: 12/01/2020
-Nicholson, Frances, and Judith Kumin (2017). A guide to international refugee protection and building state asylum systems. Inter-Parliamentary Union: Geneva, Switzerland.
-Ogata, Sadako, and James N. Purcell Jr (1997). Memorandum Of Understanding Between The United Nations High Commissioner For Refugees (UNHCR) And The International Organization For Migration (IOM) Refugee Survey Quarterly, Vol.17, No. 3, pp 70-78.
-Papanicolopulu, I. (2016). The duty to rescue at sea, in peacetime and in war: A general overview. International Review of the Red Cross, 98(902), 491-514.
-Rashmee Roshan Lall (2018). Why Europe seeks an ‘Australian solution’ to the migrant issue The Arab Weekly, 08/07/2018, accessed via: https://thearabweekly.com/why-europe-seeks-australian-solution-migrant-issue, Date Accessed 12/01/2020.
-Rosoeg, Erik, The duty to rescue refugees and migrants at sea, 25 March 2020, https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/centre-criminology/centreborder-criminologies/blog/2020/03/duty-rescue, pp.1-4. Date Accessed 4 December 2020.
-Talaie, F., & Javidbakht, M. (2020). Analysis of the ISPS Code and Its Implementation: Case Study of Malaysia and South Korea. The Iranian Review for Law of the Sea and Maritime Policy, 1(1), 85-117.
-The rescue of migrants at sea-obligations of the shipping industry, https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/09f857fc/the-rescue-of-migrants-at-sea---obligations-of-the-shipping-industry, March 2016, pp.1-4, Date Accessed 4 December 2020.
-UNC Center for European Studies, (2016). The EU’s Refugee and Terrorism Crisis.
-UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division (2017). Handbook on Measuring International Migration through Population Censuses.
-UN DESA (1998). Recommendations on Statistics of International Migration.
-UNHCR (2002). Background Note on The Protection of Asylum-Seekers and Refugees Rescued at Sea.
-UNHCR (2017). Global Trend, Forced Displacement.
-UN Human Rights, Office of the High Commissioner (2015). The principle of non-refoulement under international human rights law, accessed via: https://www.ohchr.org/  Documents/Issues/Migration/GlobalCompactMigration/ThePrincipleNon-Refoulement UnderInternationalHumanRightsLaw.pdf, accessed date 12/01/2020
-Vakilpour, Z., & Rastegari, B. (2018). The Need for Rehabilitation of Terrorists in Iran. Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses, 10(10), 17-19.
-Worster, W. T. (2014). The contemporary international law status of the right to receive asylum. International Journal of Refugee Law, Vol. 26, No.4, 477-499.