Document Type : Original Article

Author

University of Tehran,Law faculty,International law

10.22034/irlsmp.2021.122126

Abstract

The oceans which cover 70 percent of the Earth’s surface contain the most biologically diverse ecosystems on earth, we depend on the seas for our survival since they support for life on earth. They are also essential for our economic prosperity, social well-being and quality of life. Yet the marine environment is deteriorating fast. We need to find better ways of managing it. Over the last decade, significant advances in citizen science have occurred, allowing projects to extend areas beyond national jurisdiction. Perhaps however, our greatest challenges are those that exist in the Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ), where management is reliant on international agreements and enforcement is likely to need remote monitoring methods using satellite technologies. In view of this development, the aim of this article is to provide some information on the marine scientific research and examines the applicability of the marine scientific research (MSR) regime of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). However, the MSR regime of UNCLOS far from an absolute freedom, it is conditional on responsibilities including, for example, providing the legal basis for setting up obligations such as conservation and sustainable use of environment. The article concludes by outlining some of the issues that should play important role in the process of researching.

Keywords

Main Subjects

-Alex G. Oude Elferink, (2012)‘Governance Principles for Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction’ 27 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 205
-Alfred Soons, (1977)‘The International Legal Regime for MSR’ 24 Netherlands International Law Review 393.
-Angus Stevenson (ed.), (2014) Oxford Dictionary of English, 3rd edn, Oxford University Press
-Caroline E. Foster, (2011) Science and the Precautionary Principle in International Courts and Tribunals: Expert Evidence, Burden of Proof and Finality, Cambridge University Press
-Elizabeth J. Farnsworth and Judy Rosovsky, (1993) ‘The Ethics of Ecological Field Experimentation’7 Conservation Biology 463.
-Elmar Döhler and Carsten Nemitz, (2000) ‘Wissenschaft und Wissenschaftsfreiheit in internationalen Vereinbarungen’ in Helmut Wagner (ed.), Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen für Wissenschaft und Forschung. Forschungsfreiheit und Staatliche Regulierung, vol 1
-Florian H. Th Wegelein, (2005) MSR: the Operation and Status of Research Vessels and other Platforms in International Law , Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
-Gerald Francis Graham, (1980) ‘The Freedom of Scientific Research in International Law: Outer Space, the Antarctic and the Oceans’ (DPhil Thesis, Université de Genève
-Harriet Harden-Davies & and Paul Snelgrove, ( 2020) Science Collaboration for Capacity Building: Advancing Technology Transfer Through a Treaty for Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction, POLICY AND PRACTICE REVIEWS ARTICLE,
-Helene Marsh and Richard Kenchington, (2004) ‘The Role of Ethics in Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology’300 Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
-Hilde Woker et al, ( 2020) The law of the sea and current practices of marine scientific research in the Arctic, Marine Policy Volume 115
-Jutta Brunnée, (2005)  ‘International Legal Accountability through the Lens of the Law of State Responsibility 36 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 21
-Lisa Dilling and Rachel Hauser, (2013)  ‘Governing Geoengineering Research: Why, When and How?’ 121 Climatic Change 553.
-Milner B. Schaefer, (1969) ‘Freedom of Scientific Research and Exploration in the Sea’, Stanford Journal of International Studies 46,
-OSPAR Commission, ‘OSPAR Code of Conduct for Responsible Marine Research in the Deep Seas and High Seas of the OSPAR Marine Area
-Patricia Birnie, (1995)  ‘Law of the Sea and Ocean Resources: Implications for MSR’ 10 International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 229
-Philomène A. Verlaan, (2007)  ‘Experimental Activities that Intentionally Perturb The marine environment: Implications for The marine environmental Protection and MSR Provisions of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea’ 31 Marine Policy 210
-Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 19 June 2015, UN Doc. A/RES/69/292.
-Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 24 December 2017, UN Doc. A/RES/72/249,
-Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area (Advisory Opinion), [2011] ITLOS Case No. 17, (2011) 50 International Legal Materials 458 (Seabed Mining Advisory Opinion)
-Rob Bellamy, (2014)‘Beyond Climate Control: “Opening up” Propositions for Geoengineering Governance’ Climate Geoengineering Governance Working Paper Series: 011
-Silvio Funtowicz and Jerome Ravetz, (1993)  ‘Science for the post-normal age’ 25 Futures 739
-Simon Marr, (2000) ‘The Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases: The Precautionary Approach and Conservation and Management of Fish Resources’11 European Journal of International Law 815
-U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982
-Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties,1969
-Yoshifumi Tanaka, (2008)  A Dual Approach to Ocean Governance: the Cases of Zonal and Integrated Management in International Law of the Sea, Ashgate Publishing.